1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | 160 | Etna |
Year Released | 1973 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |