1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1990 Toyota Model F
To start off, 1990 Toyota Model F is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Toyota Model F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1990 Toyota Model F. (76 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1990 Toyota Model F. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Toyota Model F weights approximately 235 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Toyota Model F (140 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Toyota Model F will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1990 Toyota Model F | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | 160 | Model F |
Year Released | 1973 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1638 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |