1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1991 Renault Clio

To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (182 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: