1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1995 Toyota MRJ
To start off, 1995 Toyota MRJ is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Toyota MRJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1995 Toyota MRJ. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1995 Toyota MRJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Toyota MRJ weights approximately 507 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Toyota MRJ (285 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 1995 Toyota MRJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1995 Toyota MRJ | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | 160 | MRJ |
Year Released | 1973 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1638 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1572 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |