1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 1996 Honda Integra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,638 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda Integra weights approximately 134 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1996 Honda Integra | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | 160 | Integra |
Year Released | 1973 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1638 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2570 mm |