1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2001 Ford F-650

To start off, 2001 Ford F-650 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford F-650 (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford F-650 weights approximately 203 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 1013 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: