1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2002 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2002 Ford Mondeo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mondeo (222 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 391 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mondeo (280 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (163 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2002 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1981 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 222 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91.7 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |