1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2002 Hyundai Equus

To start off, 2002 Hyundai Equus is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Hyundai Equus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Hyundai Equus (194 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Equus should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Hyundai Equus weights approximately 895 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Hyundai Equus (271 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Hyundai Equus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Chrysler 160 2002 Hyundai Equus
Make Chrysler Hyundai
Model 160 Equus
Year Released 1973 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1812 cc 2970 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 101 HP 194 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 153 Nm 271 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1095 kg 1990 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 5070 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2840 mm