1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2002 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2002 Lincoln Continental is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2002 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | 160 | Continental |
Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 410 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 571 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |