1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2004 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2004 Toyota Corolla is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Corolla (194 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 155 kg more than 2004 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Corolla (260 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2004 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | 160 | Corolla |
Year Released | 1973 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 940 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |