1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 421 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1248 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (713 Nm) has 588 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | 160 | Ram |
Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1638 cc | 8277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 713 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 2313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3070 mm |