1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2005 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 432 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: