1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 207 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler 160 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1302 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2990 mm |
