1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2005 Honda Jazz

To start off, 2005 Honda Jazz is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,638 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Honda Jazz. (77 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 2005 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 17 kg more than 2005 Honda Jazz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Honda Jazz (151 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2005 Honda Jazz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: