1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,638 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler 160 | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | 160 | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1638 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 211 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1065 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2840 mm |
