1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 160 | 5 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |