1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2008 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2008 Honda Jazz is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,638 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2008 Honda Jazz.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda Jazz. (119 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2008 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | 160 | Jazz |
Year Released | 1973 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1638 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 119 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2460 mm |