1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Avenger (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Avenger (166 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler 160 | 2009 Dodge Avenger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
| Model | 160 | Avenger |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1638 cc | 2399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2770 mm |
