1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Ford Flex
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (256 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (245 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler 160 | 2009 Ford Flex | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | Flex |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1638 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1930 mm |
