1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Chrysler 160 2009 Mazda RX-8
Make Chrysler Mazda
Model 160 RX-8
Year Released 1973 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1812 cc 1308 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 101 HP 232 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 8500 RPM
Torque 153 Nm 216 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 5500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1095 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4470 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2710 mm