1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Doblo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Doblo. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Doblo.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Doblo (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Doblo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Fiat Doblo | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | 160 | Doblo |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2755 mm |