1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (387 HP) has 286 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (520 Nm) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 387 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 520 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2838 mm |