1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo

To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,638 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2010 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 2010 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2010 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Smart ForTwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Smart ForTwo.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Chrysler 160 2010 Smart ForTwo
Make Chrysler Smart
Model 160 ForTwo
Year Released 1973 2010
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 1638 cc 1000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 79 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 92 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1065 kg 820 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 2695 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1560 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1542 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 1867 mm