1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2011 Hyundai Elantra
To start off, 2011 Hyundai Elantra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Hyundai Elantra (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Hyundai Elantra should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Hyundai Elantra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Hyundai Elantra (177 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2011 Hyundai Elantra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2011 Hyundai Elantra | |
Make | Chrysler | Hyundai |
Model | 160 | Elantra |
Year Released | 1973 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 177 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |