1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | 160 | Clio |
Year Released | 1973 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |