1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 2012 Honda Civic

To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Civic (198 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda Civic weights approximately 202 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Civic (193 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 2012 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: