1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1973 Chrysler Charger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 50 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (318 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | Charger | Renown |
Year Released | 1973 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2750 mm |