1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 1962 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1973 Chrysler Charger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 930 kg more than 1962 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 1962 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Charger | Seven |
Year Released | 1973 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |