1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 1970 Jaguar Type E
To start off, 1973 Chrysler Charger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (227 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1970 Jaguar Type E. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1970 Jaguar Type E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jaguar Type E weights approximately 20 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler Charger | 1970 Jaguar Type E | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | Charger | Type E |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |
