1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E

To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. (134 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 180 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (486 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mercedes-Benz E.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Chrysler Charger 1996 Mercedes-Benz E
Make Chrysler Mercedes-Benz
Model Charger E
Year Released 1973 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5899 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 252 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 486 Nm 190 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1380 kg 1560 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2840 mm