1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (252 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1996 Renault Clio. (250 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 270 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (486 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Clio. (407 Nm). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Charger | Clio |
Year Released | 1973 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5899 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 486 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |