1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 444 kg more than 1997 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (678 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler Charger. (486 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Charger | Mustang |
Year Released | 1973 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5899 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 486 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2580 mm |