1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 245 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (272 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler Charger | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | Charger | Zo |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 272 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2580 mm |
