1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2000 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 223 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler Charger. (227 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (664 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler Charger. (461 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 2000 Dodge Viper | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Charger | Viper |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 7999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 450 HP |
Torque | 461 Nm | 664 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.3 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 98.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |