1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 58 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler Charger. (272 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Charger | TL-50 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 272 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |