1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 422 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Chrysler Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler Charger | 2002 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mahindra |
| Model | Charger | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 3523 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 272 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1782 kg |
