1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2002 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2002 Westfield ZEI is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2002 Westfield ZEI. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 2002 Westfield ZEI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 708 kg more than 2002 Westfield ZEI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 2002 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | Chrysler | Westfield |
Model | Charger | ZEI |
Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 5899 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 672 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2340 mm |