1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (486 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Charger | E-250 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5899 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 486 Nm | 389 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3510 mm |