1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2004 Lincoln LS

To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler Charger. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 399 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler Charger. (318 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler Charger.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Chrysler Charger 2004 Lincoln LS
Make Chrysler Lincoln
Model Charger LS
Year Released 1973 2004
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4014 cc 3933 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 163 HP 280 HP
Torque 318 Nm 388 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1330 kg 1729 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 4940 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2910 mm