1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2005 Mazda B2500

To start off, 2005 Mazda B2500 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B2500. (204 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger.

Because 2005 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Chrysler Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (486 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B2500. (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B2500.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Chrysler Charger 2005 Mazda B2500
Make Chrysler Mazda
Model Charger B2500
Year Released 1973 2005
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5899 cc 4030 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 252 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 486 Nm 323 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1380 kg 1705 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 5010 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2990 mm