1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher.
Because 1973 Chrysler Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Charger | Colt |
Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |