1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2005 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC70 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (252 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2005 Volvo XC70. (206 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo XC70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Because 2005 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Chrysler Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (486 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volvo XC70. (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volvo XC70.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 2005 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Charger | XC70 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5899 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 486 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1400 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2570 mm |