1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (227 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (461 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Chrysler | Isuzu |
Model | Charger | KB |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 461 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.3 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3060 mm |