1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler Charger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler Charger.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (318 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler Charger | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
| Model | Charger | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4014 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 318 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3010 mm |
