1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2006 SSC Aero

To start off, 2006 SSC Aero is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SSC Aero (1,062 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 924 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler Charger. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 67 kg more than 2006 SSC Aero.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 SSC Aero (1,357 Nm @ 5800 RPM) has 1085 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler Charger. (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 SSC Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler Charger.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Chrysler Charger 2006 SSC Aero
Make Chrysler SSC
Model Charger Aero
Year Released 1973 2006
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 3523 cc 6000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 138 HP 1062 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 272 Nm 1357 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 5800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1360 kg 1293 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 4470 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 2080 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1090 mm