1973 Chrysler Charger vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 375 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1973 Chrysler Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Charger (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Charger | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Charger | Clio |
Year Released | 1973 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 272 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |