1973 Chrysler Sedan vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1973 Chrysler Sedan is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 4,340 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Sedan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Sedan (200 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Sedan should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Sedan weights approximately 310 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler Sedan | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | Sedan | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4340 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2540 mm |
