1973 Chrysler Valiant vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1973 Chrysler Valiant is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,342 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler Valiant. (201 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler Valiant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Valiant weights approximately 264 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Valiant (355 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1973 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Valiant | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Valiant | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4342 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2420 mm |