1973 Chrysler Valiant vs. 1992 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1992 Ford Taurus is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Taurus (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler Valiant. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler Valiant.
Because 1973 Chrysler Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Valiant (272 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Taurus. (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Valiant | 1992 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Valiant | Taurus |
Year Released | 1973 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 272 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |