1973 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Valiant (227 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Valiant should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Chrysler Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler Valiant (461 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler Valiant | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Valiant | Ranger |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 461 Nm | 324 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.3 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 84.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3010 mm |